@DevOpsSummit Authors: Yeshim Deniz, Liz McMillan, Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White, Flint Brenton

Related Topics: Microservices Expo

Microservices Expo: Blog Post

A Look at the Google Nexus Q

If you thought you needed the Nexus Q, you’re probably wrong

Google is pushing their ecosystem past the desktop and mobile environments. Starting with Google TV and continuing with the Nexus Q, Google is attempting to move their ecosystem into your living. A user of Google TV myself, I have enjoyed the system and the user interface, but it is clearly a beta product. The current Google TV interface is lacking, yet capable. It needs more third-party developer support, a concern which I’m sure will plague the Nexus Q.

The Nexus Q has USB/HDMI/Ethernet/Optical/WiFi, but it also has a built in amplifier to power real speakers. This does make the somewhat capable of being it’s own surround system (albeit with unpowered speakers next to it), yet any real audiophile will have it plugged into a far superior set up.

If you thought you needed the Nexus Q, you’re probably wrong

The Nexus Q offers a nice, solid ability to play music, check out YouTube and do other webcentric capabilities. It has already been hacked to play Angry Birds, and will probably see further Android Development.

The Nexus Q has a bevy of connection ports, including amplified outputs for speakers

However, the Nexus Q is another (in a long line) of Google Beta products. While the intent and the possibility for success is there, the execution has fallen short. My first concern with the Nexus Q is that it requires a smartphone or tablet to control it. Instead of being a full on Android computer (of which it is fully capable), it is somewhat hampered.

The Q is designed to play nice with all your Android devices (but especially if they have NFC).

Google is trying hard to find a place in the living room, to extend their ecosystem past traditional or mobile computing. While tablets, especially the Nexus 7 will do great, in the living room, replacing set top boxes and the like is going to be harder. Internet TV has been somewhat successful with the Roku and the Apple TV, but these are inexpensive options (compared to the $299 that the Nexus Q costs).

This is where the Nexus Q really fails, it is far too expensive for what it offers. Google has started to change way that mobile devices cost with the GSM Galaxy Nexus and the Nexus 7 tablets, yet they are asking for over 3x the going rate of comparative devices.

I (along with many others) would certainly be willing to roll the dice on the Nexus Q for just $99, but at $299, I just find the price too steep for the pay off. When you can purchase the Nexus 7 tablet for just $199/$249 or still one of the strongest smartphones on the market (the GSM Galaxy Nexus for$349) $299 for the Nexus Q is just a little too rich for my blood.

Please leave your comments about the Nexus Q below, will you be buying one?

This post by was first published at CTOvision.com.

Read the original blog entry...

More Stories By Bob Gourley

Bob Gourley writes on enterprise IT. He is a founder of Crucial Point and publisher of CTOvision.com

@DevOpsSummit Stories
Andi Mann, Chief Technology Advocate at Splunk, is an accomplished digital business executive with extensive global expertise as a strategist, technologist, innovator, marketer, and communicator. For over 30 years across five continents, he has built success with Fortune 500 corporations, vendors, governments, and as a leading research analyst and consultant.
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settlement products to hedge funds and investment banks. After, he co-founded a revenue cycle management company where he learned about Bitcoin and eventually Ethereum.
For far too long technology teams have lived in siloes. Not only physical siloes, but cultural siloes pushed by competing objectives. This includes informational siloes where business users require one set of data and tech teams require different data. DevOps intends to bridge these gaps to make tech driven operations more aligned and efficient.
For organizations that have amassed large sums of software complexity, taking a microservices approach is the first step toward DevOps and continuous improvement / development. Integrating system-level analysis with microservices makes it easier to change and add functionality to applications at any time without the increase of risk. Before you start big transformation projects or a cloud migration, make sure these changes won’t take down your entire organization.
It is ironic, but perhaps not unexpected, that many organizations who want the benefits of using an Agile approach to deliver software use a waterfall approach to adopting Agile practices: they form plans, they set milestones, and they measure progress by how many teams they have engaged. Old habits die hard, but like most waterfall software projects, most waterfall-style Agile adoption efforts fail to produce the results desired. The problem is that to get the results they want, they have to change their culture and cultures are very hard to change. To paraphrase Peter Drucker, "culture eats Agile for breakfast." Successful approaches are opportunistic and leverage the power of self-organization to achieve lasting change.