Welcome!

@DevOpsSummit Authors: Liz McMillan, Yeshim Deniz, Zakia Bouachraoui, Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White

Related Topics: @DevOpsSummit, Microservices Expo, Eclipse, PHP

@DevOpsSummit: Blog Post

Changing App Delivery Strategy? by @LMacVittie | @DevOpsSummit [#DevOps]

As the technology behind VDI has matured, many organizations have begun to reconsider their initial, early decisions

One of the more popular methods of dealing with not just with the explosion of devices but the growing challenge of dealing with growth of compute devices under management in general is virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI). While VDI has been overshadowed of late by newer and shinier TLAs like SDN and IoT, it remains nonetheless a critical component of most organizations growth strategy.

changeoftenAs the technology behind VDI has matured, many organizations have begun to reconsider their initial, early decisions to go with one technology over another. That's natural, as it often takes time after adopting early technologies to really understand the long term costs (TCO) and ability of that technology to scale along with the business. It's also natural because at some point, all solutions end up in the "end of life" category, which means no more vendor support. That's true of both Windows Server 2003 and Citrix XenApp 5.0. Organizations that aren't already on Citrix XenApp 7.5 or XenDesktop 7.1 are facing what looks like a full rip and replace effort. An effort that is not going to be easy or cheap.

But while VDI and mobility are certainly important to an organization's growth strategy, they aren't the only concerns. A significant number of desktops remain tethered to PCs and need just as much attention, if not more. Some organizations, after taking a closer look at what they have - and projecting costs and scalability into the future - may be looking to migrate to a different solution. That's particularly true when said organizations look at the disparity between their server and desktop virtualization platforms and realize that standardization on one platform for both would ultimately realize some significant operational cost savings.

But changing your virtual desktop and application publishing strategy isn't as easy as snapping your fingers, of course. Transitioning from one technology to another can be scary. That's one of the reasons VMware has introduced a new program called Safe Passage, designed to help organizations migrate its virtual, mobile and desktop application environments safely and smoothly to VMware Horizon.

As the preferred delivery solution for VMware Horizon, F5 helps smooth the transition from one VDI solution to another. Because apps are delivered to users and F5 is always in the critical path between users and, well, just about every app they use, including virtual desktops, F5 is uniquely positioned to assist in the migration to a VMware Horizon environment.

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager makes it easy to provide secure access control, traffic management, and the best possible performance for VMware Horizon with View deployments. F5's customized iApps make it possible to fully deploy in as little as two hours, and cost-effective licensing combined with VMware's Safe Passage incentives makes it easy to build a business case.

Change can be scary, but you don't have to face it alone. VMware's tools and guidance along with F5's eighteen years of expertise in delivering apps can make the transition a whole lot simpler, smoother and way less scary.

Not sure about that?

Say you want to transition users from Citrix desktops and published apps to Horizon desktops and published apps. Using F5 BIG-IP APM you can add policy checks that query Active Directory for a security group value and if the user is in a Citrix group the APM webtop presents Citrix desktop and apps. To transition the user all that’s necessary is to change the Active Directory group to which the user belongs and voila! Automagically the user will now receive Horizon apps and desktops on their webtop. It really is that easy. No disruption at all to the user, no changes to the workflow, no new training because the user still browses to vdi.company.com. The magic power of BIG-IP APM and its Visual Policy Editor make it simplicity itself thanks to F5’s ability to replace the View Security Server and proxy Horizon for View 6 published applications.

For more information on VMware's Safe Passage program, click here and read on.

Read the original blog entry...

More Stories By Lori MacVittie

Lori MacVittie is responsible for education and evangelism of application services available across F5’s entire product suite. Her role includes authorship of technical materials and participation in a number of community-based forums and industry standards organizations, among other efforts. MacVittie has extensive programming experience as an application architect, as well as network and systems development and administration expertise. Prior to joining F5, MacVittie was an award-winning Senior Technology Editor at Network Computing Magazine, where she conducted product research and evaluation focused on integration with application and network architectures, and authored articles on a variety of topics aimed at IT professionals. Her most recent area of focus included SOA-related products and architectures. She holds a B.S. in Information and Computing Science from the University of Wisconsin at Green Bay, and an M.S. in Computer Science from Nova Southeastern University.

@DevOpsSummit Stories
With more than 30 Kubernetes solutions in the marketplace, it's tempting to think Kubernetes and the vendor ecosystem has solved the problem of operationalizing containers at scale or of automatically managing the elasticity of the underlying infrastructure that these solutions need to be truly scalable. Far from it. There are at least six major pain points that companies experience when they try to deploy and run Kubernetes in their complex environments. In this presentation, the speaker will detail these pain points and explain how cloud can address them.
While DevOps most critically and famously fosters collaboration, communication, and integration through cultural change, culture is more of an output than an input. In order to actively drive cultural evolution, organizations must make substantial organizational and process changes, and adopt new technologies, to encourage a DevOps culture. Moderated by Andi Mann, panelists discussed how to balance these three pillars of DevOps, where to focus attention (and resources), where organizations might slip up with the wrong focus, how to manage change and risk in all three areas, what is possible and what is not, where to start, and especially how new structures, processes, and technologies can help drive a new DevOps culture.
When building large, cloud-based applications that operate at a high scale, it's important to maintain a high availability and resilience to failures. In order to do that, you must be tolerant of failures, even in light of failures in other areas of your application. "Fly two mistakes high" is an old adage in the radio control airplane hobby. It means, fly high enough so that if you make a mistake, you can continue flying with room to still make mistakes. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Lee Atchison, Principal Cloud Architect and Advocate at New Relic, discussed how this same philosophy can be applied to highly scaled applications, and can dramatically increase your resilience to failure.
As Cybric's Chief Technology Officer, Mike D. Kail is responsible for the strategic vision and technical direction of the platform. Prior to founding Cybric, Mike was Yahoo's CIO and SVP of Infrastructure, where he led the IT and Data Center functions for the company. He has more than 24 years of IT Operations experience with a focus on highly-scalable architectures.
The explosion of new web/cloud/IoT-based applications and the data they generate are transforming our world right before our eyes. In this rush to adopt these new technologies, organizations are often ignoring fundamental questions concerning who owns the data and failing to ask for permission to conduct invasive surveillance of their customers. Organizations that are not transparent about how their systems gather data telemetry without offering shared data ownership risk product rejection, regulatory scrutiny and increasing consumer lack of trust in technology in general.